Skip to main content

TDD BDD and SDET REsume

 **TDD vs BDD**


Test-Driven Development (TDD) and Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) are both agile methodologies but with distinct focuses and processes. TDD vs BDD a developer-centric practice, emphasizes writing tests before the actual code, guiding software development through small, testable chunks. It's particularly effective in ensuring that the codebase remains bug-free and maintainable. BDD, on the other hand, extends TDD by specifying software behaviors using a language understandable by all stakeholders, including non-technical ones. This approach fosters collaboration and a shared understanding of the project's goals, making it easier to align development with customer needs and expectations. While TDD is focused on the technical aspects and validation of software functionality, BDD is more about clear communication and the behavior of the application from the user's perspective.


**SDET Resume**


An SDET Resume should effectively showcase a blend of software development and quality assurance expertise. The key is to highlight proficiency in writing and testing code, automating tests, and understanding software design and architecture. An ideal SDET resume would include experience in designing, implementing, and maintaining test automation frameworks, along with proficiency in programming languages relevant to the job (like Java, Python, or C#). It's also beneficial to detail experience with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) tools, version control systems like Git, and testing tools such as Selenium or JUnit. Including specific achievements, such as improving test coverage or efficiency, can set the resume apart. This resume should not only reflect technical competence but also an understanding of software development processes and the ability to work closely with development teams to build high-quality software.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Test Automation Experience

  🚀 Super thrilled to share my incredible test automation journey in the healthcare domain! 🏥🌟 From pioneering success to finding the perfect balance, it has been an exhilarating ride that shaped my understanding of test automation. 💻🧪 During the mid-2000s, our forward-thinking healthcare company established a dedicated automation group armed with powerful tools like Windrunner and QTP. With a unique blend of software test engineers and healthcare SMEs, we gained comprehensive insights into the intricacies of the healthcare domain. 💡👩‍💻🔍 https://testmetry.com/test-automation-at-a-healthcare/ Our secret to success? Maintaining script stability and an impressively low false failure rate by keeping our regression testing scripts actively engaged. Efficiency soared with a vast library of reusable functions, and parallel execution capabilities revolutionized our testing environment. 🚀📈💻 The "rolling regression" approach tackled complexity head-on, while user-friendly
Post a Comment
Read more

Scriptless vs Scripted Automation Frameworks

The quality engineering team has a crucial role in improving the time to market for services and product, and in ensuring customer delight. Architects have been developing new practices to automate the life cycle processes to reduce test cycle time and improve the product quality. Scriptless test automation is one such practice that is an alternative to the traditional automation, which was programming language dependent. The adoption rate of Scriptless frameworks has improved in the last couple of years but still, there prevail apprehensions around its capabilities. Difference between the Working of Scriptless Automation Testing Tools and Scripted Automation Testing Tools Scriptless automation tools use the technique of auto-generating test scripts instead of an automation engineer writing a test script manually using a programming language. The language used in the tool might be proprietary or open, depending on the tool strategy of the vendor.  The Scriptless technique is slightly
Post a Comment
Read more